🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots added after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday went kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously backed the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. So I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it so afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on the island with a high participation. I believe occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. But overall, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key figures from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.