🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized professional network test recently following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content appear to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."